LOCAL REVIEW · New content and source imagery await owner approvalEvidence & image credits

Library / Case studies & history

Case study / 2 min read

The test shoot that made the handoff visible

Epic and Bullitt’s 2021 production test is a useful lesson in stage preparation—not a promise that every shoot can finish in four days.

Prepared 16 September 2026 · Historical source date: 8 November 2021 · Local draft · Site publication: not published
A vehicle frame published with Epic and Bullitt’s ICVFX production test. It illustrates that project, not a plate-capture setup or an independent performance test.
A vehicle frame published with Epic and Bullitt’s ICVFX production test. It illustrates that project, not a plate-capture setup or an independent performance test. Epic Games / Bullitt production test · Publication permission pending owner review. View full size

A production problem, not just a demo

In November 2021, Epic published an account of a test made with filmmakers’ collective Bullitt on NantStudios’ Los Angeles LED stage. It exercised Unreal Engine 4.27 workflows for vehicle shots, multiple cameras, and changes to lighting and backgrounds. Epic reported four days to produce final pixels. That is a vendor-reported result for this test, not a complete accounting of development, preparation, or the cost of an equivalent commercial job.

Source: Taking Unreal Engine’s latest in-camera VFX toolset for a spin

What the team put into the workflow

The account describes Level Snapshots for returning to previous scene states, remote controls for on-set adjustments, and OpenColorIO for color management. Together, these address three different questions: can we restore a setup, can the right person change it, and are departments looking at a consistent interpretation of the image? The photograph is a frame from the project, not an ordinary location photograph.

Source: Taking Unreal Engine’s latest in-camera VFX toolset for a spin

The part worth borrowing

Atlas analysis

Make your own test deliberately inconvenient. Include a return to an earlier lighting setup, a lens change, and a revised camera angle. A smooth first take tests the prepared path; returning to a setup tests whether the team can actually operate the show.

Ask the stage and art teams to agree on a short acceptance record. Keep one frame from the approved camera view, the scene revision, the restore point, and the person responsible for each adjustment. That makes the handoff tangible without pretending that one checklist replaces a technical rehearsal.

  • Recreate an approved setup after making changes.
  • Check the image through the production camera, not only the editor.
  • Keep preparation time separate from time spent shooting.
Keep this in mind

Borrow the test structure, not the headline schedule.

Sources & evidence

Primary documentation establishes tool behavior or a reported production. Checklists and illustrative examples are Atlas editorial guidance, not results of independent testing. Match documentation to your installed version.

Taking Unreal Engine’s latest in-camera VFX toolset for a spin

Source published: 8 November 2021 · Retrieved 16 September 2026

In-Camera VFX Best Practices

Source published: Not established · Retrieved 16 September 2026